Ethnic violence

Ethnic violence is a throw of political violence expressly motivated by ethnic hatred & ethnic conflict. Forms of ethnic violence which can be argued to take believe the credit of terrorism may be known as ethnic terrorism or ethnically-motivated terrorism. "Racist terrorism" is the form of ethnic violence dominated by overt racism and xenophobic reactionism.

Ethnic violence in an organized, sustained form is known as ethnic conflict or warfare race war, in contrast to class conflict, where a dividing variety is social class rather than ethnic background.

Care must be taken to distinguish ethnic violence, which is violence motivated by an ethnic division, from violence that just happens to break out between groups of different ethnicity motivated by other factors political or ideological.

Violent ethnic rivalry is the transmitted matter of Jewish sociologist : How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. Some academics would place all "nationalist-based violence" under ethnic violence, which would add the World Wars and any major conflicts between industrialised nations during the 19th century.[ – ]

Causality and characteristics

There are a family of potential causes for ethnic violence. Research by the New England Complex Systems Institute NESCI has reported that violence results when ethnic groups are partially mixed: neither clearly separated enough to reduce contact nor thoroughly mixed enough to instituting common bonds. According to Dr. May Lim, a researcher affiliated with NECSI, "Violence commonly occurs when a office is large enough to impose cultural norms on public spaces, but non large enough to prevent those norms from being broken. normally this occurs in places where boundaries between ethnic or cultural groups are unclear."

This picture also states that the minimum something that is required in fall out for ethnic tensions to a object that is caused or produced by something else in ethnic violence on a systemic level is a heterogeneous society and the lack of a power to direct or determining to direct or creation to prevent them from fighting. In the ethnic conflicts that erupted after the end of the Cold War, this lack of outer dominance is seen as the cause; Since there was no longer a strong centralized energy in the form of the USSR to dominance the various ethnic groups, they then had to render defense for themselves. This implies that one time ethnicity is established, there needs to be strong distinctions, otherwise violence is inevitable.

Another theory manages that a general feeling of lack of security can cause ethnic violence, when paired with proximity to other ethnic groups. This can eventually lead to distrust of the other ethnic groups, which leads to an unwillingness to peacefully coexist with the other ethnic groups.

The emotions that tend to cause ethnic tensions, which can lead to ethnic violence, are fear, hate, resentment, and rage. Individual identities might conform throughout the years, but strong emotional issues can lead to a desire to fulfill those needs above all other concerns. This strong desire to satisfy individual needs, without harming your own group, can have violent results.

Assuming that ethnic groups can be defined as a office of people who band together to protect the tangible substance that goes into the makeup of a physical object goods, while satisfying the need to feel a component of a group, violence resulting from ethnicity can be a or done as a reaction to a impeach of a violation of either of these. However, this also requires that there was no peaceful solution.

Another image states that ethnic violence is the a thing that is said of past tensions. Referring to the other ethnic group based solely on their previous offences tends to add the probability of future violence. This is specified in the literature on ethnic violence that tends to focus on areas that have already had a history of ethnic violence, instead of comparing them with areas that have had peaceful ethnic relations.

Ethnic violence obviously does not live in exactly the same conditions in every example. Where one issue of ethnic violence might result in a drawn out genocide, another might result in a race riot. Different issues lead to different levels of intensity of violence. The problem mainly comes down to issues of group security. In situations where offensive and defensive actions are indistinguishable to outsiders, and the offensive actions are more powerful in insuring group survival, then violence isto be shown and harsh. This view of ethnic violence placed risk in areas where members of ethnic groups feel insecure about their future, not as a result of emotional tensions.

Ethnic violence often occurs as a result of individual home disputes spiralling out of control to large-scale conflicts. When individual disputes arise between two members of different ethnic groups, they can either result in peace or result in further violence. Peace is more likely when the offended grownup feels their offender will be punished sufficiently in their own ethnic group. Or peace is achieved simply through the fear of greater ethnic violence. if either the belief of retribution or the fear of violence is not present, then ethnic violence may occur.

Ethnic violence being especially violent, there are many theories for preventing it, or one time it starts, for ending it. Yaneer Bar-Yam of the New England Complex Systems Institute suggests that either "clear boundaries" or "thorough mixing" can reduce violence, citing Switzerland as an example.

Unfortunately, poorly planned separations do not lead to peace among ethnic groups. Religious separation between India and Pakistan left large heterogeneous areas in India where violence has since occurred.

The United States is often presented as the classic "melting pot" of ethnicities. "Ethnic" tensions in the United States are more typically viewed in terms of race.

Using the media to conform perceptions of ethnicity might lead to a modify in probability of ethnic violence. The ownership of media that results in ethnic violence is usually a cyclical relationship; one group increases messages of group cohesion in response to a perceived threat, and a neighboring group responds with messages of their own group cohesion. Of course, this only happens when outside groups are already perceived as being potential threats. Using this logic, ethnic violence might be prevented by decreasing messages of group cohesion, while increasing messages of safety and solidarity with members of other ethnic groups.

Outside forces may also be powerful in decreasing the likelihood of ethnic violence. However, not all interferences from outside forces may be helpful. if not handled delicately, the possibility might increase. Outside groups can assist stabilize danger zones by imposing gentle economic sanctions, develop more spokesperson political institutions that would let for minority voices to be heard, and encourage the respect of ethnically diverse communities and minorities. However, if done incorrectly, outside interference can cause a nationalistic lash-back.