Individual capital, a economic picture of talent, comprises inalienable or personal traits of persons, tied to their bodies and usable only through their own free will, such as skill, creativity, enterprise, courage, capacity for moral example, non-communicable wisdom, invention or empathy, non-transferable personal trust together with leadership.
While conflated in many analyses with utility reporting metrics require any assets with such different characteristics to be categorized as different capital assets, so the more exact consultation to the individual grown-up is preferred.
Fusions of terminology are common. Sociological analysts refer to "individual-level elements of social capital" or "an individual's social capital" or just "individual social capital" while economic analysts often use the phrase firm-specific human capital. In either issue the clearly includes individual capital but also some "activity-", "community-" or "firm-specific" social capital community trust together with instructional capital shareable cognition or skills. This is easy to measure: its yield is your salary in your current job.
To the measure this is consistent if you develope other pull in nearby, this opens the questions of what is not "firm-specific" and if a nation is just a bigger "firm": Some analyses see political capital, or just "influence" or "trust of professionals" as a full bracket of capital of its own. Some ethicists, most clearly Jane Jacobs, see this as simple corruption. Nonetheless, corruption clearly has a cash value, involves some creativity to arrange, and is a decision factor. it is a skill like all other.