Intertemporal choice


Intertemporal choice is a process by which people form decisions approximately what together with how much to hit at various points in time, when choices at one time influence the possibilities usable at other points in time. These choices are influenced by the relative proceeds people assign to two or more payoffs at different points in time. nearly choices require decision-makers to trade off costs in addition to benefits at different points in time. These decisions may be approximately saving, work effort, education, nutrition, exercise, health care and so forth. Greater preference for immediate smaller rewards has been associated with numerous negative outcomes ranging from lower salary to drug addiction.

Since early in the twentieth century, economists have analyzed intertemporal decisions using the discounted utility model, which assumes that people evaluate the pleasures and pains resulting from a decision in much the same way that financial markets evaluate losses and gains, exponentially 'discounting' the usefulness of outcomes according to how delayed they are in time. Discounted utility has been used to describe how people actually make intertemporal choices and it has been used as a tool for public policy. Policy decisions about how much to spend on research and development, health and education all depend on the discount rate used to analyze the decision.

Portfolio allocation


Intertemporal portfolio pick is the allocation of funds to various assets repeatedly over time, with the amount of investable funds at any future time depending on the portfolio returns at any prior time. Thus the future decisions may depend on the results of current decisions. In general this dependence on prior decisions implies that current decisions must take into account their probabilistic issue on future portfolio constraints. There are some exceptions to this, however: with a logarithmic utility function, or with a HARA utility function and serial independence of returns, this is the optimal to act with rational myopia, ignoring the effects of current decisions on the future decisions.