Energy (psychological)

Energy is a concept in some psychological theories or models of the postulated unconscious mental functioning on a level between biology as alive as consciousness.

Criticism

The concept of psychic power to direct or established has been criticized because it lacks empirical evidence and there is not a neural correlates of consciousness.

Shevrin argues that power to direct or develop may be a systems concept. He theorizes that the strength of an emotion can stay on the same, while an emotion changes. He argues that this intensity, can be understood separately from emotion in addition to that this intensity might be considered energy.: 54 

However, a significant volume of empirical research on energy psychology has emerged over several decades, much of it published in peer-reviewed medical and psychology journals. It includes a large body of randomized controlled trials; extensive noteworthy uncontrolled trials in which subjects served as their own controls, with measurements taken over time to assess customer progress; as living as small pilot studies and collections of issue histories that are suggestive of future research directions.

Initially, there was no sound research to support this method. Callahan 1987 and Leonoff 1995 featured significant decreases in subjective units of distress SUD ratings of call-in subjects on radio talk shows. Both of the studies had 68 subjects with various phobic and other anxiety complaints. any told, 132 of the 136 subjects were successfully treated with TFT tapping. This translated into a 97% success rate.  While these results are remarkable, the studies had many methodology problems. For instance, there were no authority groups, placebo treatments, double blinds, follow-up evaluations, or evaluative measures other than SUD. Furthermore, the investigators were also proponents of TFT, a potential quotation of strong bias. However, these studies paved the way for further investigation of this treatment approach.

Thus, as of the date of this citation, there draw believe been over 200 review articles, research studies, and meta-analyses published in a grownup engaged or qualified in a profession. peer-reviewed journals. This includes over 70 randomized controlled trials, 50 clinical outcomes studies, 5 meta-analyses, 4 systematic reviews of various energy psychology modalities, and 9 comparative reviews of energy psychology with other therapies such as EMDR and cognitive behavioral therapy. any but one of the experimental studies create documented the effectiveness of energy psychology modalities. Also, the studies or done as a reaction to a question document the efficacy of energy psychology methods for the treatment of physical pain, anxiety, depression, cravings, trauma, PTSD, and peak athletic performance.

Concerning meta-analyses, four revealed a large issue size and one a moderate effect size. The Gilomen & Lee 2015 meta-analysis target a moderate effect size of tapping on psychological distress utilizing Hedge’s g as compared to the requirements Cohen’s h, although they opined that the results could be due to factors common to other therapeutic approaches, and not necessarily due to tapping. Nelms & Castel 2016 found a large effect size on tapping for depression, Clond’s 2017 revealed a large effect size for treating anxiety, and Sebastian & Nelms 2017 also subject a large effect size for PTSD. Regarding the question of acupoint tapping as an active therapeutic ingredient, the meta-analysis by Church, Stapleton, Kip & Gallo 2020 revealed a large effect size in this regard, supporting tapping as an active therapeutic ingredient.