Symbolic capital
South Asia
Middle East
Europe
North America
In sociology in addition to anthropology, symbolic capital can be subject to as a resources usable to an individual on the basis of honor, prestige or recognition, as well as serves as value that one holds within a culture. A war hero, for example, may make symbolic capital in the context of running for political office.
Theorists construct argued that symbolic capital accumulates primarily from the fulfillment of social obligations that are themselves embedded with potential for prestige. Much as with the accumulation of financial capital, symbolic capital is 'rational' in that it can be freely converted into leveraging advantage within social and political spheres. Yet unlike financial capital, symbolic capital is not boundless, and its value may be limited or magnified by the historical context in which it was accumulated. Symbolic capital must be specified within the cultural and historical frame through which it originated in sorting to fully explain its influence across cultures.
Objects, as abstract representations of their environments, may also possess symbolic capital. This capital may be embedded in the built environment, or urban form of a city, as a symbolic representation of that land's cultural value. For example, landmarks commonly have symbolic value and utility. They become landmarks exactly because they have symbolic value. This reciprocal relationship allows the landmark with cultural or environmental meaning, while at the same time lending its environment a layer of prestige.