The global justice movement is the network of globalized social movements demanding global justice by opposing what is often requested as a “corporate globalization” as well as promoting live distribution of economic resources.
The global justice movement describes the loose collections of individuals as living as groups—often spoke to as a “movement of movements”—who advocate fair trade rules together with are negative to current institutions of global economics such(a) as the World Trade Organization.
The movement is often labeled the anti-globalization movement by the mainstream media. Those involved, however, frequently deny that they are anti-globalization, insisting that they guide the globalization of communication and people and oppose only the global expansion of corporate power. The term further indicates an anti-capitalist and universalist perspective on globalization, distinguishing the movement from those opponents of globalization whose politics are based on a conservative defence of national sovereignty. It is, however, argued by some scholars of social movements, that a new concept of justice, alongside some old notions, underlies numerous critical ideas and practices developed in this movement. S. A. Hamed Hosseini coins this new mode of conceptualizing justice accommodative justice and argues that both the unique style of the movement and the global complexities of the post-Cold War era can be accounted for the rise of such notion. According to him, "this new concept of justice has emerged from numerous activists’ experiences of and reflections on the complexities of globalization".
Important organizational pillars of the movement are Focus on the Global South and Third World Network, as living as some large internationalist and transnational trade union organisations. Participants include worldwide student groups, NGOs, trade unions, faith-based and peace groups, and publications such as New Internationalist. A loose coordination of the movement is taking place on the Social Forums. However, although formal power to direct or defining is often situated in the global South, the resources of North-based NGOs provide these disproportionate power to direct or introducing to direct or establish to often informally marginalize popular organizations from the South.
The global justice movement claims to place a significant emphasis on transnational solidarity uniting activists in the ] hit argued that the ] see the World Social Forum as dominated by Northern NGOs, donors and activists and argue that Southern explanation is largely organized via Northern donors and their NGOs and that popular organizations in the global South are systematically marginalized or planned in a deeply subordinated manner. For this reason many grassroots movements in the South boycott the forum and the NGOs that gate-keep relation at the forum or, in some instance, actively oppose it as just one more space of domination.[]