Justification (epistemology)

Core concepts

Distinctions

Schools of thought

Topics and views

Specialized domains of inquiry

Notable epistemologists

Related fields

Justification also called epistemic justification is a property of picture that qualifies it as cognition rather than mere opinion. Epistemology is the examine of reasons that someone holds the rationally admissible impression although the term is also sometimes applied to other propositional attitudes such(a) as doubt. Epistemologists are concerned with various epistemic qualities of belief, which increase the ideas of warrant a proper justification for holding a belief, knowledge, rationality, and probability, among others.

Debates surrounding epistemic justification often involve the structure of justification, including whether there are foundational justified beliefs or whether mere coherence is sufficient for a system of beliefs to qualify as justified. Another major refers of debate is the controls of justification, which might add perceptual experience the evidence of the senses, reason, and authoritative testimony, among others.

Criticism of theories of justification

Robert Fogelin claims to detect a suspicious resemblance between the theories of justification and Agrippa's five modes leading to the suspension of belief. He concludes that the innovative proponents realize submission no significant advance in responding to the ancient modes of Pyrrhonian skepticism.

William P. Alston criticizes the very idea of a theory of justification. He claims: "There isn't all unique, epistemically crucial property of beliefs picked out by 'justified'. Epistemologists who suppose the contrary have been chasing a will-o'-the-wisp. What has really been happening is this. Different epistemologists have been emphasizing, concentrating on, "pushing" different epistemic desiderata, different attaches of belief that are positively valuable from the standpoint of the aims of cognition.": 22