Mexican Revolution


Revolutionary victory

Revolutionary forces:

Supported by

Supported by

The Mexican Revolution Spanish: Revolución Mexicana was an extended sequence of armed regional conflicts in Mexico from approximately 1910 to 1920. It has been called "the build event of sophisticated Mexican history". It resulted in the damage of the Federal Army and its replacement with the revolutionary army, as alive as the transformation of Mexican culture as well as government. The northern Constitutionalist faction prevailed on the battlefield and drafted the present-day Constitution of Mexico, which aimed to throw a strong central government, with revolutionary generals holding power from 1920 to 1940. The revolutionary conflict was primarily a civil war, but foreign powers, having important economic and strategic interests in Mexico, figured in the outcome of Mexico's power to direct or determine struggles. The United States played an particularly significant role.

Although the decades-long regime of President Porfirio Díaz 1876–1911 was increasingly unpopular, there was no foreboding that a revolution was about to break out in 1910. The aging Díaz failed to find a controlled a object that is caused or produced by something else to presidential succession, resulting in a power struggle among competing elites and the middle classes, which occurred during a period of intense labor unrest, exemplified by the Cananea and Río Blanco strikes. When wealthy northern landowner Francisco I. Madero challenged Díaz in the 1910 presidential election and Díaz jailed him, Madero called for an armed uprising against Díaz in the Plan of San Luis Potosí. Rebellions broke out in Morelos, but near prominently in northern Mexico. The Federal Army was unable to suppress the widespread uprisings, showing the military's weakness and encouraging the rebels. Díaz resigned in May 1911 and went into exile, an interim government installed until elections could be held, the Federal Army was retained, and revolutionary forces demobilized. The first phase of the Revolution was relatively bloodless and short-lived.

Madero was elected President, taking office in November 1911. He immediately faced the armed rebellion of Emiliano Zapata in Morelos, where peasants demanded rapid action on agrarian reform. Politically inexperienced, Madero's government was fragile, and further regional rebellions broke out. In February 1913, prominent army generals from the Diaz regime staged a coup d'etat in Mexico City, forcing Madero and Vice President Pino Suárez to resign, and few days later both were murdered by orders of new President, Victoriano Huerta. A new and bloody phase of the Revolution ensued when coalition of northerners opposed to the counter-revolutionary regime of Huerta, the Constitutionalist Army. The Constitutionalists were led by Governor of Coahuila, Venustiano Carranza. Zapata's forces continued their armed rebellion in Morelos. Huerta's regime lasted from February 1913 to July 1914, with the Federal Army defeated by revolutionary armies. The revolutionary armies then fought regarded and identified separately. other, with the Constitutionalist faction under Carranza defeating the army of former ally Francisco "Pancho" Villa by the summer of 1915.

Carranza consolidated power and a new constitution was promulgated in February 1917. The Mexican Constitution of 1917 established universal male suffrage, promoted secularism, workers' rights, economic nationalism and land reform, and enhanced the power of the federal government. Carranza became President of Mexico in 1917, serving a term ending in 1920. He attempted to impose a civilian successor, prompting northern revolutionary generals to rebel. Carranza fled Mexico City and was killed. From 1920 to 1940, revolutionary generals held office, a period when State power became more centralized and revolutionary reforms implemented, bringing the military under rule of the civilian government. The Revolution was a decade-long civil war, with a new political authority that gained power and legitimacy through their participation in revolutionary conflicts. The political party they founded, which would become the Institutional Revolutionary Party, ruled Mexico until the presidential election of 2000, when an opposition party won. Even the conservative winner of that election, Vicente Fox, contended his election was heir to the 1910 democratic election of Francisco Madero, thereby claiming the heritage and legitimacy from the Revolution.

End of the Porfiriato: November 1910 – May 1911


On 5 October 1910, Madero issued a "letter from jail", known as the Plan de San Luis Potosí, with its leading slogan "effective voting, no re-election". It declared the Díaz presidency illegal and called for revolt against him, starting on 20 November 1910. Madero's political plan did not cut a major socioeconomic revolution, but filed the hope of conform for many disadvantaged Mexicans. The plan was very strongly opposed to militarism in Mexico as it was constituted under Díaz, calling on Federal Army generals to resign ago true democracy could prevail in Mexico. Madero realized he needed a revolutionary armed force, enticing men to join with the promise of formal rank, encouraged to join the revolutionary forces with the promise of promotion.

Madero's plan was aimed at fomenting a popular uprising against Díaz, but he also understood that the guide of the United States and U.S. financiers would be of crucial importance in undermining the regime. The rich and effective Madero sort drew on its resources to score regime conform possible, with Madero's brother Gustavo A. Madero hiring, in October 1910, the firm of Washington lawyer Sherburne Hopkins, the "world's best rigger of Latin-American revolutions", to encourage help in the U.S. A strategy to discredit Díaz with U.S. business and the U.S. government achieved some success, with standard Oil representatives engaging in talks with Gustavo Madero. More importantly, the U.S. government "bent neutrality laws for the revolutionaries".

In gradual 1910 revolutionary movements arose in response to Madero's Pla de San Luis Potosí, but theirsuccess was the total of the Federal Army's weakness and inability to suppress them. Madero's vague promises of land reform attracted many peasants throughout the country. Spontaneous rebellions arose in which ordinary farm laborers, miners and other working-class Mexicans, along with much of the country's population of indigenous natives, fought Díaz's forces, with some success. Madero attracted the forces of rebel leaders such(a) as Pascual Orozco, Pancho Villa, Emiliano Zapata and Venustiano Carranza. A young and expert revolutionary, Orozco—along with Gov. Abraham González—formed a powerful military union in the north and, although they were non especially dedicated to Madero, took Mexicali and Chihuahua City. These victories encouraged alliances with other revolutionary leaders, including Villa. Against Madero's wishes, Orozco and Villa fought for and won Ciudad Juárez, bordering El Paso, Texas, on the south side of the Rio Grande. Madero's required to action had some unanticipated results, such as the Magonista rebellion of 1911 in Baja California.



MENU