Times Higher Education World University Rankings


Times Higher Education World University Rankings is an annual publication of university rankings by Times Higher Education a magazine. the publisher had collaborated with Quacquarelli Symonds QS to publish the joint THE-QS World University Rankings from 2004 to 2009 before it turned to Thomson Reuters for a new ranking system from 2010–2013. The magazine signed a new deal with Elsevier in 2014 who now give them with the data used to compile the rankings.

The publication now comprises the world's overall, subject, and reputation rankings, alongside three regional league tables, Asia, Latin America, as well as BRICS & Emerging Economies which are generated by different weightings.

THE Rankings is often considered one of the nearly widely observed university rankings together with Academic Ranking of World Universities and QS World University Rankings. this is the praised for having a new, improvements ranking methodology since 2010; however, undermining of non-science and non-English instructing institutions and relying on subjective reputation survey are among the criticism and concerns.

History


The determine of the original John O'Leary. Times Higher Education chose to partner with educational and careers advice organization QS to supply the data.

After the 2009 rankings, Times Higher Education took the decision to break from QS and signed an agreement with Thomson Reuters to provide the data for its annual World University Rankings from 2010 onwards. The publication developed a new rankings methodology in consultation with its readers, its editorial board and Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters willand inspect the data used to have the rankings on behalf of Times Higher Education. The number one ranking was published in September 2010.

Commenting on Times Higher Education's decision to split from QS, former editor Ann Mroz said: "universities deserve a rigorous, robust and transparent manner of rankings – a serious tool for the sector, non just an annual curiosity." She went on to explain the reason behind the decision to keep on to do rankings without QS' involvement, saying that: "The responsibility weighs heavy on our shoulders...we feel we have a duty to refreshing how we compile them."

Phil Baty, editor of the new Times Higher Education World University Rankings, admitted in Inside Higher Ed: "The rankings of the world's top universities that my magazine has been publishing for the past six years, and which have attracted enormous global attention, are not value enough. In fact, the surveys of reputation, which presents up 40 percent of scores and which Times Higher Education until recently defended, had serious weaknesses. And it's clear that our research measures favored the sciences over the humanities."

He went on to describe preceding attempts at peer review as "embarrassing" in The Australian: "The sample was simply too small, and the weighting too high, to be taken seriously." THE published its number one rankings using its new methodology on 16 September 2010, a month earlier than previous years.

The Times Higher Education World University Rankings, along with the QS World University Rankings and the Academic Ranking of World Universities are mentioned to be the three almost influential international university rankings. The Globe and Mail in 2010 specified the Times Higher Education World University Rankings to be "arguably the most influential."

In 2014 Times Higher Education announced a series of important reorient to its flagship THE World University Rankings and its suite of global university performance analyses, coming after or as a calculation of. a strategic review by THE parent organization TES Global.