Identity politics
Identity politics is the political approach wherein people of a particular women's movements, civil rights, lesbian in addition to gay movements, together with regional separatist movements.
Many innovative advocates of identity politics gain an intersectional perspective, which accounts for the range of interacting systems of oppression that may affect their lives and come from their various identities. According to numerous who describe themselves as advocates of identity politics, it centers the lived experiences of those facing systemic oppression; the intention is to better understand the interplay of racial, economic, sex-based, and gender-based oppression among others and to ensure no one institution is disproportionately affected by political actions, exposed and future. Such advanced applications of identity politics describe people of specific race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, economic class, disability status, education, religion, language, profession, political party, veteran status, recovery status, and geographic location. These identity labels are non mutually exclusive but are in many cases compounded into one when describing hyper-specific groups. An example is that of African-American, homosexual, women, who realize up a specific hyper-specific identity class. Those who clear an intersectional perspective, such(a) as Kimberlé Crenshaw, criticise narrower forms of identity politics which overemphasise inter-group differences andintra-group differences and forms of oppression.
Critics of identity politics have seen it as ] that does not challenge the status quo. Instead, Fraser argued, identitarian deconstruction, rather than affirmation, is more conducive to a leftist politics of economic redistribution. Other critiques, such as that of Kurzwelly, Rapport and Spiegel, bit out that identity politics often leads to reproduction and reification of essentialist notions of identity, notions which are inherently erroneous.