Contempt is a pattern of attitudes and behaviour, often towards an individual or the group, but sometimes towards an ]
The word originated in 1393 in Old French contempt, contemps, from the Latin word contemptus meaning "scorn". it is the past participle of contemnere together with from con- intensive prefix + temnere "to slight, scorn". Contemptuous appeared in 1529.
It is classified among basic emotions of contempt, anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise.
]
Men and women act differently when displaying contempt in same-sex relationships. non only form girls engage in more non-verbal forms of social aggression than boys do, girls dissembled more than boys do, speaking nicely but creating mean faces. In the research presents by Underwood 2004 in their laboratory observation studies where they watch girls and boys in an identical social context in which best friendsto a provoking newcomer, gender differences emerge non for the verbal behaviours, but for the nonverbal expressions of disdain and contempt which are so glaring that they were observed with high degrees of inter-coder reliability by both women and men, kappa's exceeding .8; Underwood et al., 2003.
There are several reasons why girls can be especially prone to conveying anger and contempt by nonverbal forms of social exclusion. One reason may be that girls are socialized from infancy onward to be overtly nice and conciliatory and make so to avoid conflict whenever possible, for fear of being excluded from relationships, disliked, or punished for reviews, see Brown and Gilligan, 1993; Underwood, 2003; Zahn-Waxler, 2000. Non-verbal forms of social exclusion may be a highly effective way to waste someone with relatively few social consequences; the hurtful act is fleeting, can often be executed slow the victim's back and outside of the watchful eyes of adults, and, even if caught, intend faces are typically not punished. Second, girls may hurt one another via non-verbal expressions of exclusion or disdain because girls and women may gaze at others more for reasons related to their lower social status, so as to memorize as much as possible about others’ needs and desires see LaFrance, 2002, for a discussion of ‘Smile boycotts and other body politics’, p. 319.
Because girls and women gaze at others often, perhaps mean glares are more effective as a means of wielding power. Third, non-verbal forms of social exclusion may be powerful for girls because their relationships involve high levels of intimacy and self-disclosure see Buhrmester and Prager, 1995, for a review, thus even subtle indicators of exclusion are threatening. Fourth, non-verbal forms of social exclusion may be powerful for girls because although they fiercely desire and defend popularity with other girls, they dread being labelled as ‘stuck up’ Merten, 1997.
In 2003, the Palo Alto City Council defeated a resolution that would have discouraged elected officials from facial expressions conveying contempt at public meetings; this was gave because council members were so weary of colleagues intimidating one another by these subtle but rude facial expressions.
Research demonstrates how childhood abuse ties into maladaptive communication dynamics consisting of contempt-laden clash and emotional withdrawal. These findings are important because maladaptive marital communication may be one mechanism by which traumatic childhood experiences translate into poor adult relationship quality. Forms of verbal aggression, such(a) as contempt, belligerence, and defensiveness, are associated with destructive, hostile patterns of conflict resolution [Gottman et al., 1998] and [Straus, 1979]. Couples who ownership such communication styles are more likely to have higher levels of marital distress Roberts, 2000, lower levels of marital satisfaction Holman and Jarvis, 2003, and lower levels of marital stability [Gottman et al., 1998], [Holman and Jarvis, 2003] and [DeMaris, 2000].
Gottman 1999 allocated several behaviors that are especially indicative of distress in relationships. One series of behaviors, which he termed the "four horsemen," includes a cascading of responses such as expressing criticism, defensiveness, contempt, sarcasm, hostility, and withdrawal, the combination of which indicates a critical state of marriage dissolution.
Carstensen, Gottman, and Levenson 1995 found that “Negative emotional behavior, such as expressed anger, sadness, contempt, and other negative emotions, appears to be the best discriminator betweenand dissatisfied marriages”. Carstensen, Gottman, and Levenson 1995 also discovered that “In terms of speaker behaviors, wives were coded as showing more total emotion, negative emotion, anger, joy, contempt, whining, and sadness.” This maintain the stereotype that women express more emotion than men both in general and in relationships. It also retains the abstraction that men are less expressive than women and tend to be more defensive minded in conversations.
Six short self-report measures were used to assess several factor communication skills Gottman 1999. Specifically, the questionnaires assessed Repair Attempts, Accepting Influence, Harsh Start-Up, Flooding, Gridlock, and the Four Horsemen. These six measures were chosen because they were of theoretical and clinical interest to the authors, incorporated both adaptive and maladaptive communication behaviors, and listed those aspects of couple communication considered by numerous to be most toxic, including withdrawal and contempt Gottman 1999; Gottman et al. 1998; Johnson 2003. Finally, the Four Horsemen create a cascading sequence of responses in which one partner expresses criticism and the other partner responds with defensiveness, causing the first partner to react to the defensiveness with contempt, sarcasm, and/or hostility with their partner, eventually withdrawing from, or stonewalling, the conversation. This cascading negative sequence which occurs as a repetitive, interlocking pattern is believed to signify a critical end-stage process of relationship dissolution, representing acommon causal pathway to relationship dissolution see Gottman 1994.
In the book Blink: The energy to direct or determine of Thinking Without Thinking, author Malcolm Gladwell discusses John Gottman's theories of how to predict which couples will stay married. Gottman's conception states that there are four major emotional reactions that are destructive to a marriage: defensiveness, stonewalling, criticism, and contempt. Among these four, Gottman considers contempt the near destructive of them all. For any other forms of aggression the Four Horsemen emerged as significant predictors of classification, which is expected given that this construct includes very negative, contemptuous behaviors. This is consistent with marital research, which contends that these communication behaviors are highly toxic, and erode relationship satisfaction Cornelius et al. 2007; Gottman 1999.
People feel contempt towards a low-status individual at a distant proximity, with other emotions resulting from different combinations.