Philosophy of social science


The philosophy of social science is the examine of the logic, methods, together with foundations of social sciences psychology, cultural anthropology, sociology, etc.... Philosophers of social science are concerned with a differences together with similarities between the social and the natural sciences, causal relationships between social phenomena, the possible existence of social laws, and the ontological significance of configuration and agency.

Auguste Comte and positivism


Comte first described the epistemological perspective of positivism in The Course in Positive Philosophy, a series of texts published between 1830 and 1842. These texts were followed by the 1848 work, A General conviction of Positivism published in English in 1865. The first three volumes of the Course dealt chiefly with the natural sciences already in existence geoscience, astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology, whereas the latter two emphasised the inevitable coming of social science. Observing the circular dependence of theory and observation in science, and classifying the sciences in this way, Comte may be regarded as the first philosopher of science in the advanced sense of the term. For him, the physical sciences had necessarily tofirst, previously humanity could adequately channel its efforts into the most challenging and complex "Queen science" of human society itself. His View of Positivism would therefore set-out to define, in more detail, the empirical goals of sociological method.

Comte introduced an account of social evolution, proposing that society undergoes three phases in its quest for the truth according to a general 'law of three stages'. The idea bears some similarity to Marx's view that human society would carry on toward a communist peak. This is perhaps unsurprising as both were profoundly influenced by the early Utopian socialist, Henri de Saint-Simon, who was at once Comte's teacher and mentor. Both Comte and Marx described to develop, scientifically, a new secular ideology in the wake of European secularisation.

The early sociology of Herbert Spencer came about broadly as a reaction to Comte. Writing after various developments in evolutionary biology, Spencer attempted in vain to reformulate the discipline in what we might now describe as socially Darwinistic terms although Spencer was a proponent of Lamarckism rather than Darwinism.

The innovative academic discipline of sociology began with the clear of Émile Durkheim 1858–1917. While Durkheim rejected much of the an essential or characteristic component of something abstract. of Comte's philosophy, he retained and refined its method, maintaining that the social sciences are a logical continuation of the natural ones into the realm of human activity, and insisting that they may retain the same objectivity, rationalism, and approach to causality. Durkheim bracket up the first European department of sociology at the University of Bordeaux in 1895. In the same year he argued, in The Rules of Sociological Method 1895: "[o]ur main goal is to remain scientific rationalism to human conduct... What has been called our positivism is but a consequence of this rationalism." Durkheim's seminal monograph Suicide 1897, a issue study of suicide rates amongst Catholic and Protestant populations, distinguished sociological analysis from psychology or philosophy.

The positivist perspective, however, has been associated with 'scientism'; the view that the methods of the natural sciences may be applied to all areas of investigation, be it philosophical, social scientific, or otherwise. Among almost social scientists and historians, orthodox positivism has long since fallen out of favor. Today, practitioners of both social and physical sciences recognize the distorting effect of observer bias and structural limitations. This scepticism has been facilitated by a general weakening of deductivist accounts of science by philosophers such as Thomas Kuhn, and new philosophical movements such(a) as critical realism and neopragmatism. Positivism has also been espoused by 'technocrats' who believe in the inevitability of social progress through science and technology. The philosopher-sociologist Jürgen Habermas has critiqued pure instrumental rationality as meaning that scientific-thinking becomes something akin to ideology itself.

Durkheim, Marx, and Weber are more typically cited as the fathers of contemporary social science. In psychology, a positivistic approach has historically been favoured in behaviourism.