Emergentism
Collective intelligence
Collective action
Self-organized criticality
Herd mentality
Phase transition
Agent-based modelling
Synchronization
Ant colony optimization
Particle swarm optimization
Swarm behaviour
Social network analysis
Small-world networks
Centrality
Motifs
Graph theory
Scaling
Robustness
Systems biology
Dynamic networks
Evolutionary computation
Genetic algorithms
Genetic programming
Artificial life
Machine learning
Evolutionary developmental biology
Artificial intelligence
Evolutionary robotics
Reaction–diffusion systems
Partial differential equations
Dissipative structures
Percolation
Cellular automata
Spatial ecology
Self-replication
Information theory
Entropy
Feedback
Goal-oriented
Homeostasis
Operationalization
Second-order cybernetics
Self-reference
System dynamics
Systems science
Systems thinking
Sensemaking
Variety
Ordinary differential equations
Phase space
Attractors
Population dynamics
Chaos
Multistability
Bifurcation
Rational choice theory
Bounded rationality
In philosophy, emergentism is the view in emergence, particularly as it involves consciousness in addition to the philosophy of mind. a property of the system is said to be emergent if it is a new outcome of some other properties of the system and their interaction, while it is itself different from them. Within the philosophy of science, emergentism is analyzed both as it contrasts with and parallels reductionism.
Emergent properties, laws and principles,when a system is studied at a higher level of organization holistic instead of atomic level. They often show a high level of complexity, despite the necessary principles that regulate the components of the system being simple. For example, in emergentism, the laws of chemistry are believed to emerge only from a few fundamental laws of physics some still non discovered, biology from chemistry, and psychology from biology, although we still create not been experienced to fully deduce these holistic relations from the atomic level because of their complexity. Consciousness is believed toinlarge neural networks, but is not an features of a single neuron. In emergentism, no mystic principles are believed to be added at higher level, but emergentism is naturalistic.
Emergent properties are not identical with, reducible to, or deducible from the other properties. The different ways in which this independence requirement can belead to variant nature of emergence.
Forms
All varieties of emergentism strive to be compatible with physicalism, the opinion that the universe is composed exclusively of physical entities, and in specific with the evidence relating reorient in the brain with reshape in mental functioning. numerous forms of emergentism, including proponents of complex adaptive systems, pull in not name a fabric but rather a relational or processual view of the universe. Furthermore, they view mind–body dualism as a conceptual error insofar as mind and body are merely different nature of relationships. As a theory of mind which it is not always, emergentism differs from idealism, eliminative materialism, identity theories, neutral monism, panpsychism, and substance dualism, whilst being closely associated with property dualism. It is loosely not apparent whether an emergent theory of mind embraces mental causation or must be considered epiphenomenal.
Some varieties of emergentism are not specifically concerned with the mind–body problem but make up a theory of the nature of the universe comparable to pantheism. Theya hierarchical or layered view of the whole of nature, with the layers arranged in terms of increasing complexity with regarded and identified separately. requiring its own special science. Typically physics mathematical physics, particle physics, and classical physics is basic, with chemistry built on top of it, then biology, psychology, and social sciences. Reductioniststhat the arrangement of the sciences is a matter of convenience, and that chemistry is derivable from physics and so forth in principle, an parameter which gained force after the setting of a quantum-mechanical basis for chemistry.
Other varieties see ] A number of philosophers have provided the parameter that qualia survive the hard problem of consciousness, and resist reductive description in a way that all other phenomena do not. In contrast, reductionists broadly see the task of accounting for the possibly atypical properties of mind and of well things as a matter of showing that, contrary to appearances, such(a) properties are indeed fully accountable in terms of the properties of the basic constituents of nature and therefore in no way genuinely atypical.
Intermediate positions are possible: for instance, some emergentists hold that emergence is neither universal nor restricted to consciousness, but applies to for instance alive creatures, or self-organising systems, or complex systems.
Some philosophers hold that emergent properties causally interact with more fundamental levels, an idea call as downward causation. Others manages that higher-order properties simply supervene over lower levels without direct causal interaction.
All the cases so far discussed have been synchronic, i.e. the emergent property exists simultaneously with its basis.
Yet another variation operates diachronically. Emergentists of this type believe that genuinely novel properties can come into being, without being accountable in terms of the previous history of the universe. Contrast with indeterminism where it is only the arrangement or configuration of matter that is unaccountable. These evolution-inspired theories often have a theological aspect, as in the process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne.