Urban sociology

South Asia

Middle East

Europe

North America

Urban sociology is the sociological analyse of life & human interaction in metropolitan areas. this is a a normative discipline of sociology seeking to discussing the structures, environmental processes, recast as well as problems of an urban area and by doing so render inputs for urban planning and policy making. In other words, it is for the sociological study of cities and their role in the coding of society. Like nearly areas of sociology, urban sociologists usage statistical analysis, observation, social theory, interviews, and other methods to study a range of topics, including migration and demographic trends, economics, poverty, race relations and economic trends. Urban sociology is one of the oldest sub-disciplines of sociology dating back to the mid-nineteenth century.

The philosophical foundations of advanced urban sociology originate from the hit of sociologists such(a) as Karl Marx, Ferdinand Tönnies, Émile Durkheim, Max Weber and Georg Simmel who studied and theorized the economic, social and cultural processes of urbanization and its effects on social alienation, class formation, and the production or harm of collective and individual identities.

These theoretical foundations were further expanded upon and analyzed by a house of sociologists and researchers who worked at the University of Chicago in the early twentieth century. In what became requested as the Chicago School of sociology the do of Robert Park, Louis Wirth and Ernest Burgess on the inner city of Chicago revolutionized not only the intention of urban research in sociology, but also the coding of human geography through its ownership of quantitative and ethnographic research methods. The importance of the theories developed by the Chicago School within urban sociology have been critically sustained and critiqued but still progress one of the nearly significant historical advancements in apprehension urbanization and the city within the social sciences. The discipline may draw from several fields, including cultural sociology, economic sociology, and political sociology.

Criticism

Many theories in urban sociology have been criticized, most prominently directed toward the ethnocentric approaches taken by numerous early theorists that lay groundwork for urban studies throughout the 20th century. Early theories that sought to frame the city as an adaptable “superorganism” often disregarded the intricate roles of social ties within local communities, suggesting that the urban environment itself rather than the individuals well within it controlled the spread and shape of the city. For impoverished inner-city residents, the role of highway planning policies and other government-spurred initiatives instituted by the planner Robert Moses and others have been criticized as unsightly and unresponsive to residential needs. The gradual development of empirically-based urban research reflects the failure of local urban governments to adapt and ease the transition of local residents to the short-lived industrialization of the city.

Some modern social theorists have also been critical toward the obvious shortsightedness that urban sociologists have featured toward the role of culture in the inner city. William Julius Wilson has criticized image developed throughout the middle of the twentieth century as relying primarily on structural roles of institutions, and non how culture itself affects common aspects of inner-city life such as poverty. The distance produced toward this topic, he argues, presents an incomplete image of inner-city life. The urban sociological theory is viewed as one important aspect of sociology.

The concept of urban sociology as a whole has often been challenged and criticized by sociologists through time. Several different aspects from race, land, resources, etc. have broadened the idea. Manuel Castells questioned if urban sociology even exists and devoted 40 years worth of research in layout to redefine and make different the concept. With the growing population and majority of Americans living in suburbs, Castells believes that most researchers focus their work of urban sociology around cities, neglecting the other major communities of suburbs, towns, and rural areas. He also believes that urban sociologists have over complicated the term of urban sociology and should possibly create a more clear and organized representation to their studies, arguing that a "Sociology of Settlements," would proceed most issues around the term.

Many urban sociologists focus behind the concept behind human overpopulation. Perry Burnett, who studied at the University of Southern Indiana, researched behind the idea of Urban sprawl and city optimization for human population. Some sociologists would criticize that urbanization could range issues from racial discrimination to high income taxes. Burnett would counter the idea that urban overpopulation could actually proceeds the efficiency of cities. His work would equate optimal resources, incomes, households, etc. to display that larger and more city sizes would be more beneficial through more equal income and land distribution.