Sociology of scientific knowledge

South Asia

Middle East

Europe

North America

The sociology of scientific knowledge SSK is the inspect of science as a social activity, especially dealing with "the social conditions together with effects of science, in addition to with a social environments and processes of scientific activity." The sociology of scientific ignorance SSI is complementary to the sociology of scientific knowledge. For comparison, the sociology of knowledge studies the affect of human knowledge and the prevailing ideas on societies and relations between knowledge and the social context within which it arises.

Sociologists of scientific knowledge study the developing of a scientific field and attempt to identify points of contingency or interpretative flexibility where ambiguities are present. such(a) variations may be linked to a family of political, historical, cultural or economic factors. Crucially, the field does not category out to promote relativism or to attack the scientific project; the objective of the researcher is to explain why one interpretation rather than another succeeds due to external social and historical circumstances.

The field emerged in the slow 1960s and early 1970s and at number one was an nearly exclusively British practice. Other early centers for the development of the field were in France, Germany, and the United States notably at Cornell University. Major theorists add Barry Barnes, David Bloor, Sal Restivo, Randall Collins, Gaston Bachelard, Harry Collins, Karin Knorr Cetina, Paul Feyerabend, Steve Fuller, Martin Kusch, Bruno Latour, Mike Mulkay, Derek J. de Solla Price, Lucy Suchman and Anselm Strauss.

The sociology of mathematical knowledge

Studies of mathematical practice and quasi-empiricism in mathematics are also rightly element of the sociology of knowledge since they focus on the community of those who practice mathematics. Since Eugene Wigner raised the case in 1960 and Hilary Putnam reported it more rigorous in 1975, the question of why fields such(a) as physics and mathematics should agree so well has been debated. made solutions segment out that the necessary constituents of mathematical thought, space, form-structure, and number-proportion are also the fundamental constituents of physics. this is the also worthwhile to note that physics is more than merely modeling of reality and the objective basis is upon observational demonstration. Another approach is tothat there is no deep problem, that the division of human scientific thinking through using words such as 'mathematics' and 'physics' is only useful in their practical everyday function to classify and distinguish.

Fundamental contributions to the sociology of mathematical knowledge clear been made by Sal Restivo and David Bloor. Restivo draws upon the earn of scholars such(a) as Oswald Spengler The Decline of the West, 1918, Raymond Louis Wilder and Leslie Alvin White, as well as contemporary sociologists of knowledge and science studies scholars. David Bloor draws upon Ludwig Wittgenstein and other modern thinkers. They both claim that mathematical knowledge is socially constructed and has irreducible contingent and historical factors woven into it. More recently Paul Ernest has proposed a social constructivist account of mathematical knowledge, drawing on the workings of both of these sociologists.