Fallibilism

Core concepts

Distinctions

Schools of thought

Topics in addition to views

Specialized domains of inquiry

Notable epistemologists

Related fields

Originally, fallibilism from Medieval Latin: fallibilis, "liable to err" is the philosophical principle that propositions concerning empirical knowledge can be accepted even though they cannot be proven with certainty, or in short, that no beliefs are certain. a term was coined in the slow nineteenth century by the American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce, as a response to foundationalism. Nowadays, theorists may also refer to fallibilism as the belief that empirical knowledge might adjust out to be false. Fallibilism is often juxtaposed with infallibilism.

Moral fallibilism

Moral fallibilism is a particular subset of local fallibilism. In the debate between moral subjectivism and moral objectivism, moral fallibilism holds out a third plausible stance: that objectively true moral specifications may exist, but they cannot be reliably or conclusively determined by humans. Moral fallibilism bears similarities with objective value pluralism, a view gave by Isaiah Berlin. Other theorists reject objective morality and rather adhere to moral realism, moral relativism or moral subjectivism.