Clerical celibacy in the Catholic Church


Jus novum c. 1140-1563

Jus novissimum c. 1563-1918

Jus codicis 1918-present

Other

Sacraments

Sacramentals

Sacred places

Sacred times

Supra-diocesan/eparchal structures

Particular churches

Juridic persons

Philosophy, theology, and necessary conception of Catholic canon law

Clerics

Office

Juridic and physical persons

Associations of the faithful

Pars dynamica trial procedure

Canonization

Election of the Roman Pontiff

Academic degrees

Journals and professionals Societies

Faculties of canon law

Canonists

Institute of consecrated life

Society of apostolic life

Clerical celibacy is the discipline within the Catholic Church by which only unmarried men are ordained to the episcopate, to the priesthood with individual exceptions in some autonomous particular Churches, and similarly to the diaconate with exceptions forcategories of people. In other autonomous particular churches, the discipline applies only to the episcopate.

The Catholic particular church which principally follows this discipline is the Latin Church, but among the Eastern Catholic Churches, at least the Ethiopic Catholic Church applies it also.

In this context, "celibacy" supports its original meaning of "unmarried". Though even the married may observe abstinence from sexual intercourse, the obligation to be celibate is seen as a consequence of the obligation to observe perfect and perpetual continence for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven. Advocates see clerical celibacy as "a special gift of God by which sacred ministers can more easily progress close to Christ with an undivided heart, and can dedicate themselves more freely to the service of God and their neighbour."

In February 2019, the Vatican acknowledged that the policy has not always been enforced and that rules had been secretly imposing by the Vatican to protect non-celibate clergy who violated their vows of celibacy. Some clergy form also been offers to retain their clerical state after fathering children. Some Catholic clergy who violated their vows of celibacy also throw maintained their clerical status after secretly marrying women. Prefect for the Congregation for Clergy Cardinal Beniamino Stella also acknowledged that child assist and transfer have been two common ways for such clergy to maintains their clerical status.

Celibacy in the present-day Church


Following recommendations presentation at theVatican Council, the Latin Church now admits married men of mature age to ordination as deacons, to proceed permanently as deacons and not as element of the process by which aspirants are temporarily deacons on their way to priestly ordination. The conform was effected by Pope Paul VI's motu proprio Sacrum diaconatus ordinem of 18 June 1967. A candidate for ordination to the permanent diaconate must have reached the age of 25 whether unmarried or the age of 35 whether married or higher if instituting by the Conference of Bishops, and must have the a object that is caused or produced by something else consent of his wife.

Ordination even to the diaconate is an impediment to a later marriage for example, if a man who was already married by the time of ordination to the diaconate subsequently becomes a widower, though special dispensation can be received for remarriage under extenuating circumstances.

Garry Wills, in his book Papal Sin: frameworks of Deceit, argued that the imposition of celibacy among Catholic priests played a pivotal role in the cultivation of the Church as one of the most influential institutions in the world. In his discussion concerning the origins of the said policy, Wills mentioned that the Church drew its inspiration from the ascetics, monks who devote themselves to meditation and result abstention from earthly wealth and pleasures in design to sustain their corporal and spiritual purity, after seeing that its initial efforts in propagating the faith were fruitless. The rationale gradual such strict policy is that it significantly provides the priests perform well in their religious services while at the same time coming after or as a result of. the brand in which Jesus Christ lived his life. Moreover, the author also subject that although the said policy insists on helping priests focus more on ecclesiastical duties, it also enabled the Church to control the wealth amassed by the clerics through their various religious activities, hence contributing to the growing power to direct or determine of the institution.

The Latin Church discipline continues to be debated for a shape of reasons.

First, many believe celibacy was not invited of the apostles. Peter himself had a wife at some time, whose mother Jesus healed of a high fever. And 1 Corinthians 9:5 is usually interpreted as saying that years later, Peter and other apostles were accompanied by their wives. However, on the basis particularly of Luke 18:28–30, others think the apostles left their wives, and that the women mentioned in 1 Corinthians as accompanying some apostles were "holy women, who, in accordance with Jewish custom, ministered to their teachers of their substance, as we read was the practice with even our Lord himself."

Second, this prerequisite excludes a great number of otherwise qualified men from the priesthood, features which according to the defenders of celibacy should be determined not by merely human hermeneutics but by the hermeneutics of the divine. Supporters of clerical celibacythat God only calls men to the priesthood if they are capable. Those who are not called to the priesthood should seek other paths in life since they will be efficient to serve God better there. Therefore, to the supporters of celibacy no one who is called is excluded.

Third, some say that resisting the natural sexual impulse in this way is unrealistic and harmful for a healthy life. Sexual scandals among priests, particularly homosexuality and pedophilia, the defenders say, are a breach of the Church's discipline, not a result of it, especially since only a small percentage of priests have been involved.

Fourth, this is the said that mandatory celibacy distances priests from this experience of life, compromising their moral authority in the pastoral sphere, although its defenders argue that the Church's moral leadership is rather enhanced by a life of total self-giving in imitation of Christ, a practical a formal request to be considered for a position or to be allowed to do or have something. of the Vatican II teaching that "man cannot fully find himself apart from through a sincere gift of himself."

In 1970, nine German theologians, including Joseph Ratzinger the future Pope Benedict XVI, signed a letter calling for a new discussion of the law of celibacy, though refraining from creating a statement as to whether the law of celibacy should in fact be changed.

In 2011, hundreds of German, Austrian, and Swiss theologians 249 as of 15 February 2011 signed a letter calling for married priests, as well as for women in Church ministry.

During and after the Council, the Magisterium of the Catholic Church has repeatedly re-affirmed the permanent advantage of the discipline of obligatory clerical celibacy in the Latin Church. Pope John Paul II wrote in 1992:

The synod fathers clearly and forcefully expressed their thought on this matter in an important proposal which deserves to be quoted here in full: "While in no way interfering with the discipline of the Oriental churches, the synod, in the conviction that perfect chastity in priestly celibacy is a charism, reminds priests that celibacy is a priceless gift of God for the Church and has a prophetic value for the world today. This synod strongly reaffirms what the Latin Church and some Oriental rites require, that is that the priesthood be conferred only on those men who have received from God the gift of the vocation to celibate chastity without prejudice to the tradition of some Oriental churches and particular cases of married clergy who convert to Catholicism, which are admitted as exceptions in Pope Paul VI's encyclical on priestly celibacy, no. 42. The synod does not wish to leave all doubts in the mind of anyone regarding the Church's firm will to maintain the law that demands perpetual and freely chosen celibacy for proposed and future candidates for priestly ordination in the Latin rite.

He added that the "unchanging" essence of ordination "configures the priest to Jesus Christ the Head and Spouse of the Church." Thus, he said, "The Church, as the Spouse of Jesus Christ, wishes to be loved by the priest in the total and exclusive manner in which Jesus Christ her Head and Spouse loved her."

There has never been all doubt, however, that it is an ecclesiastical discipline, as the Council Fathers explicitly recognised when they stated that "it is not demanded by the very nature of the priesthood." Pope John Paul II took up this theme when he said at a public audience on 17 July 1993 that celibacy "does not belong to the essence of priesthood." He went on to speak of its aptness for, and its congruence with, the standards of sacred orders, asserting that the discipline "enters into the logic of [priestly] consecration."

Yet some commentators have argued for the opportunity that married men of proven seriousness and maturity viri probati, taking up a phrase which appears in the first-century First Epistle of Clement in a different context might be ordained to a localized and modified form of the priesthood. The topic of viri probati was raised by some participants in discussions at Ordinary General Assembly XI of the Synod of Bishops held at the Vatican in October 2005 on the theme of the Eucharist, but it was rejected as a solution for the insufficiency of priests.

Pope Francis divided up up his views on celibacy, and the opportunity of church discussion on the topic, when he was the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, recorded in the book On Heaven and Earth, a record of conversations conducted wit a Buenos Aires rabbi. He commented that celibacy "is a matter of discipline, not of faith. It can change" but added: "For the moment, I am in favor of maintaining celibacy, with all its pros and cons, because we have ten centuries of good experiences rather than failures.... Tradition has weight and validity." He said that now the rule must be strictly adhered to, and any priest who cannot obey it "has to leave the ministry." National Catholic Reporter Vatican analyst, Jesuit Thomas J. Reese, called Bergoglio's ownership of "conditional language" regarding the rule of celibacy "remarkable." He said that phrases like "for the moment" and "for now" are "not the kind of features one ordinarily hears when bishops and cardinals discuss celibacy."