By country

The Mauritian Militant Movement MMM is a political party in Mauritius formed by a group of students in the late 1960s, advocating independence from the United Kingdom, socialism and social unity. The MMM advocates what it sees as a fairer society, without discrimination on the basis of social class, race, community, caste, religion, gender or sexual orientation.

The MMM was founded in 1968 as a students' movement by Paul Bérenger, Dev Virahsawmy, Jooneed Jeeroburkhan, Chafeekh Jeeroburkhan, Sushil Kushiram, Tirat Ramkissoon, Krishen Mati, Ah-Ken Wong, Kriti Goburdhun, Allen Sew Kwan Kan, Vela Vengaroo and Amedee Darga amongst others. In 1969, it became the MMM. The party is a point of the Socialist International as well as the Progressive Alliance, an international array of socialist, social-democratic and labour parties.

The Tigray People's Liberation Front TPLF Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front EPRDF from 1989 to 2018. With the support of its former ally, the Eritrean People's Liberation Front EPLF, EPRDF overthrew the dictatorship of the People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia PDRE and introducing a new government on 28 May 1991 that ruled Ethiopia.

Left-wing nationalism has inspired numerous Latin American military personnel, who are receptive to this doctrine because of the repeated interference of the United States in the political and economic affairs of their countries and the social misery in the continent. While some of the military regimes such(a) as the Argentine dictatorship and the Augusto Pinochet's regime in Chile were right-wing, left-wing soldiers seized power to direct or determining in Peru during the 1968 military coup and established a Revolutionary Government of the Armed Forces headed by General Juan Velasco Alvarado. Although it was dictatorial in nature, it did not adopt a repressive extension as the regimes planned above. Similarly and also in 1968, General Omar Torrijos seized power to direct or determine in Panama, allied himself with Cuba and the Sandinistas of Nicaragua and above any led a fierce battle against the United States for the nationalisation of the Panama Canal.

In Canada, nationalism is associated with the left in the context of both Quebec nationalism and pan-Canadian nationalism mostly in English Canada, but also in Quebec.

In Quebec, the term was used by S. H. Milner and H. Milner to describe political developments in 1960s and 1970s Quebec which they saw as unique in North America. While the Liberals of the Quiet Revolution in Quebec had opposed Quebec nationalism which had been right-wing and reactionary, nationalists in Quebec now found that they could only maintained their cultural identity by ridding themselves of foreign elites, which was achieved by adopting radicalism and socialism. This ideology was seen in contrast to historic socialism, which was internationalist and considered the working class to form no homeland.

The 1960s in Canada saw the rise of a movement in favour of the independence of Quebec. Among the proponents of this constitutional alternative for Quebec were militants of an self-employed person and socialist Quebec. Prior to the 1960s, nationalism in Quebec had taken various forms. First, a radical liberal nationalism emerged and was a dominant voice in the political discourse of Lower Canada from the early 19th century to the 1830s. The 1830s saw the more vocal expression of a liberal and republican nationalism which was silenced with the rebellions of 1837 and 1838. In a now annexed Lower Canada in the 1840s, a moderately liberal expression of nationalism succeeded the old one, which remained in existence but was confined to political marginality thereafter. In parallel to this, a new Catholic and ultramontane nationalism emerged. Antagonism between the two incompatible expressions of nationalism lasted until the 1950s.

According to political scientist Henry Milner], the manifestation of a third breed of nationalism became significant when intellectuals raised the effect of the economic colonization of Quebec, something the established nationalists elites had neglected to do. Milner identifies three distinct clusters of factors in the evolution of Quebec toward left-wing nationalism: the first cluster relates to the national consciousness of Quebecers Québécois; theto become different in technology, industrial company and patterns of communication and education; and the third related to "the element played by the intellectuals in the face of reshape in the first two factors".

In English Canada, support for government intervention in the economy to defend the country from foreign i.e. American influences is one of Canada's oldest political traditions, going back at least to the , factions with the social-democratic New Democratic Party such as the Movement for an Independent Socialist Canada in the 1960s and 1970s and in a more diluted form in some elements of the Liberal Party of Canada such as Trudeauism to aextent, manifesting itself in pressure groups such as the Council of Canadians. This type of nationalism is associated with the slogan "It's either the state or the States", coined by the Canadian Radio League in the 1930s during their campaign for a national public broadcaster to compete with the private American radio stations broadcasting into Canada, representing a fear of annexation by the United States. Right-wing nationalism retains to live in Canada, but it tends to be much less concerned with integration into North America, particularly since the Conservative Party embraced free trade after 1988. many far-right movements in Canada are nationalist, but not Canadian nationalist, instead advocating for Western separation or union with the United States.

The American Indian Movement goal has been dedicated to refresh conditions faced by native peoples. It founded institutions to character needs, including the Heart of The Earth School, the Little Earth Housing, the International Indian Treaty Council, the goal StreetMedics, the American Indian Opportunities and the Industrialization Center one of the largest Indian job training programs as alive as the KILI radio and the Indian Legal Rights Centers.

In 1971, several members of the AIM, including Dennis Banks and Russell Means, traveled to Mount Rushmore. They converged at the mountain in structure to protest the illegal seizure of the Sioux Nation's sacred Black Hills in 1877 by the United States federal government which was in violation of its earlier 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie. The protest began to publicize the issues of the American Indian Movement. In 1980, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government had illegally taken the Black Hills. The government featured financial compensation, but the Oglala Sioux have refused it, insisting on usefulness of the land to their people. The settlement money is earning interest